Noida, Aug 19: India has a category problem. The woman who sows, weeds, harvests and takes the crop to market is very often not recorded as a farmer at all. She is recorded as a helper.
A new report by Arya.ag, ‘Her Harvest 2026: The hidden cost of women’s invisible work in Indian agriculture’, finds that 50.5% of women working in agriculture are classified as unpaid helpers on family farms, against 21.7% of men. The distinction is not cosmetic. In official statistics a helper is not a cultivator, and a woman who is not a cultivator cannot access what farmers access.
The report puts a price on that. Applying the FAO’s estimate that unequal access to productive resources reduces agricultural output by 2.5–4% to India’s agricultural GVA of ₹48.7 lakh crore, it estimates India forgoes ₹1.2–2 lakh crore in agricultural output every year. Not because women farm less well, but because they farm with less.
Where India’s working women actually are
The scale is easy to miss. Agriculture is the single largest employer of women in India: 64.4% of the country’s working women are engaged in it, up from 57.0% in 2017–18. Among rural working women the figure reaches 76.9%. These are shares of working women, not women’s share of the agricultural workforce, which is a separate figure of roughly 48%.
The driver is visible in any village. As men migrate to cities and move into non-farm work, the day-to-day running of the farm has passed to the women who stay. Agriculture is not where Indian women are being left behind. It is where most of them work.
The record does not call her a farmer
What has not moved with them is recognition. Alongside the 50.5% logged as unpaid helpers, women now make up roughly 48% of the agricultural workforce, up from about 30% in 2017–18. They operate 11.72% of India’s farmed area and hold 13.96% of its operational holdings, a gap of four times between the labour they contribute and the land they control.
In Indian agriculture the land title is not merely proof of ownership. It is the key that opens every other door. Formal credit, extension services, procurement systems, input subsidies and scheme access are all routed through whose name is on the deed.
So a woman without a title is not counted as a farmer, and a woman not counted as a farmer cannot borrow as one. She is pushed toward informal credit at higher cost, cannot hold produce after harvest, and sells at whatever the post-harvest price happens to be. The people doing the most work are the least able to invest in doing it better.
How India compares
India is not an outlier on paper. Women hold 13.96% of India’s operational holdings, against a global average of about 14.5% of agricultural landholders, and India is level with the United States on the comparable measure of one holder per farm, which was 13.7% in the last US census to count that way. On land area India is in fact ahead: women operate 11.72% of the farmed area here, against 8.5% in Brazil and 7% of American farmland under women principal operators.
The instructive comparison is next door. In Nepal, women hold 32.4% of agricultural holdings and operate 22.3% of the agricultural area, more than double India on both counts, on the same census concept and more recent data. Italy is at 31.5% and the European Union at 31.6%.
The point is not that India is unusually bad. It is that a 14% ceiling on women’s landholding is the global norm, and the countries that have moved past it did so by changing what a title is required for, not by waiting for deeds to change hands.
The productivity gap is an access gap
The consequences show up in the yield. Farms run by women can be 24% less productive than comparable farms of the same size run by men, a difference the report attributes to access to credit and inputs rather than to ability. Women in agrifood systems earn roughly ₹82 for every ₹100 earned by men, and women farm workers earn 20–30% less for the same work.
Multiplied across the largest agricultural workforce in the world, that is where the ₹1.2–2 lakh crore goes.
What closing the gap would do
The report’s more useful finding may be what happens on the other side of it. When women farmers earn more, the gain does not stop at the individual. It moves through the household, into nutrition, schooling and reinvestment in the farm itself.
“Women have always been central to India’s agricultural story as they have been playing a defining role in it. The opportunity ahead is to ensure that their contribution translates into greater ownership, income and influence.
Our report makes a compelling case: when women farmers have access to the right resources, from finance and storage to technology and organised markets, the gains extend well beyond the individual farmer to her household, community and the wider agricultural economy. As we mark 2026 as the International Year of the Woman Farmer, this is an opportunity to build on the progress already underway and create an agricultural ecosystem where women can participate, lead and grow on equal terms. At Arya.ag, we believe that strengthening these pathways that shift the role of women from labour to leadership is not only good for women farmers, but essential to building a more productive, resilient and inclusive agricultural economy.” said Prasanna Rao, Managing Director and CEO, Arya.ag.
The route around the title
Changing land records is slow, generational work. The report’s central argument is that agriculture does not have to wait for it. Storage, warehouse receipt finance, farmer producer organisations and agricultural technology can each deliver what a title normally delivers, which is recognition, credit and market access, without requiring the deed to change hands. Finance, in this model, follows the crop rather than the title.
Arya.ag’s own network is built on that logic. The platform operates across 21 states with over 850,000 farmers, approximately 12,000 warehouses and thousands of FPOs, allowing farmers to store produce near the farm gate, borrow against what is in storage, and sell through digital market linkages rather than at the harvest-day price.
The pattern is visible in the numbers: women-led FPOs on the platform have grown 128% in two years, and more than 50,000 women are now directly engaged on it. Through AryaShakti, in partnership with Friends of Women’s World Banking, the platform supports 10,000 farming households through women-led FPOs, while its Smart Farm Centres provide soil, weather and drone-based crop insights run by community women leaders. An IFC partnership of $2.5 million extends pre- and post-harvest solutions to smaller farmers, with a focus on women-led enterprises.
The report follows what that looks like on the ground: Nita Isal, known locally as ‘Dronewali Didi’ for the drone spraying services she now runs; Josma Konoj, who moved from agricultural labour to leading an FPO; and Suman Yadav, who helped set up a Smart Farm Centre and introduced drone spraying that cut input costs by 20% and spraying time by 70%.
Four things that would change the arithmetic
Released in 2026, the UN’s International Year of the Woman Farmer, the report argues for moving women’s participation in agriculture out of the welfare column and into the productivity one. It proposes four priorities:
-
Count her: recognise women as farmers regardless of whose name is on the land deed, and publish gender-disaggregated data across credit, procurement and FPO membership.
-
Finance her: expand collateral-light credit, warehouse receipts and women-held agricultural credit accounts, so finance follows the crop rather than only the title.
-
Equip her: widen access to drones, advisory services and market technologies through institutions women participate in and lead.
-
Organise her: build women-led FPOs as long-term market institutions rather than short-term projects.